Tel: 1-510-832-5606
Fax: 1-510-832-2436
email: liftech@liftech.net
344-20th Street, Suite 360
Oakland, CA 94612-3593 USA
www.liftech.net
We contribute technical white papers and magazine articles in a variety of venues. We regularly share our knowledge and experience at maritime conferences in the United States and around the world. Explore our publications by following the links below or select additional topics and conference series at left.
Extreme Loading of Wharf Crane Girders April 2010by Erik Soderberg, Michael Jordan, Patrick McCarthy, and Anna Dix This paper and presentation presents what happens when wharf crane girders are subjected to extreme loads near or beyond their calculated design capacity, the performance that can reasonably be expected when extreme loads occur, and when extreme loads should be considered in the design of wharf crane girders. |
Paper Presentation |
Boom Hoist Failure 2007 |
Video |
Boom Snag Failure |
Video |
Runaway Crane 2008 |
Video |
M 8.8 Chile Earthquake Port Damage Assessment March 2010by Arun Bhimani (contributor: Alberto A. Saez Geraldo of SyS Ingenieros Consultores) This presentation provides an update on the damage to the Chilean port facilities from the February 27, 2010, M 8.8 earthquake. |
Presentation |
High Performance Pile Connection: McNear’s Beach Park Pier Repair April 2010by Erik Soderberg This paper presents the repair of a damaged wharf structure by replacing the pile connections with a recently developed high-performance connection, which allows for flexible rotation. Testing by the University of Washington has shown that these connections perform significantly better during seismic loading than a classical pile connection. |
Paper |
The Floaterm Concept: Reducing Terminal Congestion with Waterside Cranes March 2007by Michael Jordan, Cathy Morris, and Anna Dix Container terminals are becoming increasingly more congested and expensive to operate. Highways and railways are already congested by container traffic and this congestion will worsen. Pollution from port operations is also a rising concern. These factors create a growing need for new, more economical terminal operation methods. Floaterm is a concept that helps alleviate congestion and pollution. This presentation discusses two variations of Floaterm concepts: midstream and ship-in-a-slip operations. Engineering calculations have been prepared to verify the technical feasibility of the concepts, but are not included here. |
Paper Presentation |
Evaluating the Seismic Capacity of a Newly Designed Wharf at the Port of Oakland March 2007by Shah Vahdani, John Egan, Robert Pyke, Chih-Cheng Ching, Tom LaBasco, and Tom Griswold This presentation discusses the findings of a seismic capacity study of a recently designed and constructed wharf (Berth 59) at the Port of Oakland (Port). This study was conducted to evaluate the reserved capacity of the wharf to resist structural collapse during a major seismic event in the Bay Area, California. The wharf was designed according to the Port’s seismic design requirements. |
Paper Presentation |
Crane Loads & Wharf Structure Design Workshop – Putting the Two Together January 2006by Arun Bhimani and Erik Soderberg This presentation discusses common inconsistencies between the design data provided by the crane supplier and the wharf design. It clarifies the basis of crane loads, recommends what crane data should be provided to the wharf designer, recommends what wharf data should be provided to the crane supplier, and presents commonly overlooked design considerations that have resulted in major failures. |
Presentation |
Ductile Links in Quay Crane Tie-down Systems October 2006by Patrick McCarthy, Erik Soderberg, and Michael Jordan Severe wind loads have caused the collapse of many cranes. The initial failure usually occurs in the wharf hardware. If there is more than one tie-down at a crane corner, the crane deflection may cause one tie-down to carry significantly more than its share of the load. If the tie-down system is not ductile, it may fail before the load is shared by the other corner tie-downs. This results in a progressive failure of the tie-downs and crane collapse. This presentation explains why forces vary between corner tie-downs and introduces the ductile link—one method to improve the reliability of new and existing tie-down systems. |
Presentation |
Increasing Crane Girder Capacity Using the Strut-and-Tie Method May 2004by Michael A. Jordan, Joe Oakley, Jr., Derrick Lind, and Thomas Griswold Over recent decades, vessel size and the weight of the heaviest marine containers have increased, resulting in increased crane reactions to the wharves. Many existing wharves cannot carry the heavier crane loads and continue to meet the original design criteria. New wharves may be excessively expensive. This paper presents a new analysis, including the strut-and-tie method, for determining the acceptable crane loads on the crane girders for many cases. This method increases the calculated ultimate capacity of crane girders. |
Paper Presentation |
Design of Earthquake Damage Repairs to Wharves Before the Earthquake Occurs May 2004by Gerald Serventi, Michael A. Jordan, George Fotinos, and Erik G. Soderberg Wharves on the West Coast are designed according to criteria that establish acceptable damage levels for design earthquakes based on probabilities, e.g., 10% chance of exceedance in 50 years. In some cases a vulnerability analysis is performed. This vulnerability analysis follows the methods described in the ASCE Seismic Guidelines for Ports and includes estimates of repair costs. The vulnerability analysis does not, however, include the development of detailed designs of the repairs. This presentation presents an anticipatory approach to the design of repairs. The presentation proposes both the development of design criteria for typical repairs and the preparation of detailed designs for select repairs that would be expected after an earthquake. |
Paper Presentation |
Operating Jumbo Cranes on Wharves March 2004by Feroze Vazifdar and Jeff Florin Many ports have older existing wharves but need newer and larger cranes to operate the larger ships. Since wharf modification can be costly, ports should investigate using new technology to re-rate the wharf prior to committing the money to upgrade. |
Presentation |
Transferring Container Cranes Around Curved Rails – Design Considerations April 2001by Erik Soderberg and Michael A. Jordan Many wharves have nonlinear berths that meet at a corner. It is often economical to share cranes between these berths, but transferring cranes around the corner is no simple task. This paper and presentation give an overview of the various methods of crane transfer: shuttle systems, the turntable system, and the curved rail, the most popular method of late and the focus of this paper. The seemingly simple curved rail system is actually quite complicated to design. This paper and presentation detail the curved rail’s many design considerations and the options available to owners. |
Paper Presentation |
“Master” Equalizer Path |
Video |
“Slave” Equalizer Paths |
Video |
“3-D” Equalizer Paths |
Video |
Berths 57, 58, and 59 Container Wharf at the Port of Oakland April 2001Paper by Simo Hoite, Thomas Dahlgren, and George Fotinos This 3,600 foot wharf will support six of the world’s largest container cranes in an area with high seismic activity and liquefiable soils. This paper presents the design of the wharf, including a method to stabilize the soft Bay Mud using a combination of Cement Deep Soil Mixing and a rock dike. The wharf project also includes a large quantity of excavation to align the shoreline and a soil management plan to dispose of the dredged materials. |
Paper |
The Impact of Jumbo Cranes on Wharves April 2001by Catherine A. Morris and Patrick McCarthy Jumbo cranes, capable of serving 22-wide ships and lifting 65 metric tons under spreader and 100 metric tons under hook, have heavier wheel loads, greater stowage and tie-down forces, and increased collision bumper loads. This creates bigger demands on the wharf and the crane-to-wharf interface. To meet the demands, crane and wharf designers must each consider the effect of their design on the other, and provide the proper loads. More cranes are damaged from failure of the connection in the wharf during high winds than from failure of the crane itself. This paper and presentation present current design issues for jumbo cranes and the wharves that must support them. |
Paper Presentation |
The 1995 Kobe Earthquake April 1995by Michael A. Jordan An assessment of the structural damages caused by the 1995 Kobe Earthquake. |
Paper |
The “Great” Guam and Hanshin Earthquakes, Profiles in Port Disasters March 1995by Feroze Vazifdar and Peter Kaldveer What have we learned? Two earthquake events, several miles apart, demonstrate that even regions situated in low to moderate seismicity are not immune from catastrophic damage. The events are discussed and performance of container terminals is compared. |
Paper |